Court dismisses buyer's claim for price reduction, holding seller bore burden of proof on defect existence.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the buyer's claim for a price reduction regarding alleged defects in the sold property. The buyer argued the seller concealed defects, while the seller remained silent regarding specific issues. The court ruled that under Article 561 of the Civil Code, the burden of proof regarding the seller's silence and the existence of defects rested with the seller, who failed to provide evidence.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 561 ust. 5 k.c.; Art. 366 k.c.: When a seller remains silent about defects, the burden of proving the existence of those defects and the seller's knowledge falls upon the seller, not the buyer.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
"To na pozwanym zaś - biorąc pod uwagę skutki milczenia sprzedawcy wprowadzone art. 561 ze zn. 5 k.c. - spoczywał obowiązek dowodowy w tym zakresie"