Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III AUa 490/18 AI generated

Family pension extension denied for age-related study delays absent objective, non-systematic causes.

Case Number III AUa 490/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the applicant's request to extend family pension rights due to study delays caused by age. The applicant argued that age-related interruptions should qualify for extension, but the court found the statutory requirement demands objective causes independent of study regularity or results. Consequently, the court ruled that age alone does not constitute a valid ground for extending the pension period.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.: The right to extend family pension for study interruptions requires objective causes independent of study regularity or results; age-related delays do not qualify.

Keywords

AI generated
family pension extension study interruption grounds age-related delays objective causes requirement social security benefits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.
Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Jedynym warunkiem przedłużenia prawa do renty rodzinnej jest kontynuowanie nauki na ostatnim roku studiów ponad ograniczenie wiekowe, obiektywne, niezależne od systematyczności nauki, jej pozytywnych rezultatów, czy ewentualnego powtarzania semestrów. Omawiany przepis powinien być zatem wykładany zgodnie z jasnym i niebudzącym wątpliwości brzmieniem nieróżnicującym przyczyn przedłużenia się czasu studiów.