VI Ka 10/19
AI generated
Court dismisses appeal and orders case termination due to expiration of criminal liability period.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court dismissed the defendant's appeal and ordered the termination of proceedings because the criminal liability for the traffic violation had expired. The defense argued that the applicable law had changed, but the court focused on the statutory limitation period. Consequently, the court ruled that the expiration of liability automatically triggered the procedural requirement to terminate the case.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 45 § 1 k.w.; Art. 5 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.w.: The expiration of criminal liability constitutes a procedural prerequisite for terminating criminal proceedings.
Keywords
AI generated
expiration of criminal liability
termination of proceedings
traffic violation offense
appellate court decision
statutory limitation period
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 45 § 1 k.w.
Art. 5 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.w.
Art. 39 § 1 k.w.
Art. 118 § 2 k.p.w.
art. 5 § 1 pkt 2 k.p
art. 5 § 1 pkt 4 k.p
art. 118 § 2 k.p
Related Decisions
AI generatedIX W 1493/16
Court convicted bus driver for parking on bus stop, acquitting him of failure to signal vehicle damage.
VI W 1611/12
Court convicted taxi driver of traffic violations for ignoring road signs and overtaking at intersection.
VI Ka 906/21
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for failing to designate vehicle operator as required by law.
VIII Ka 2/15
Court dismisses appeal against traffic violation conviction, upholding facts and penalty for drunk driving.
VI Ka 391/16
Court upheld traffic violation conviction and ordered defendant to pay appeal costs despite procedural complaints.