Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II K 81/19 AI generated

Court convicts two defendants of fraud against a bank for obtaining a loan through false income declarations and misrepresentations.

Case Number II K 81/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Regional Court in Giżycko convicted two defendants, A.S. and Ł.Ł., of fraud and false testimony against a bank for obtaining a loan through deceptive means. The court found that both acted with intent to gain financial advantage by providing false information regarding their income sources and the actual use of funds. Consequently, the court imposed prison sentences of six and ten months respectively and ordered joint compensation for the bank's losses.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 286 § 1 k.k.; Art. 297 § 1 k.k.; Art. 271 § 1 k.k.; Art. 11 § 2 k.k.; Art. 46 § 1 k.k.: When a person knowingly provides false information to a financial institution to obtain a loan, they commit fraud and false testimony, warranting criminal punishment and joint liability for damages.

Keywords

AI generated
fraudulent loan acquisition false income declaration criminal fraud joint criminal liability compensation for damages false testimony financial institution harm

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 286 § 1 k.k.
Art. 297 § 1 k.k.
Art. 271 § 1 k.k.
Art. 11 § 2 k.k.
Art. 46 § 1 k.k.
Art. 44 § 2 k.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 387 k.p.k
AI generated
IX Ka 1197/14
Court dismisses appeal for fraud conviction, upholding sentence due to recidivism and lack of repentance.
II K 129/17
Court convicted defendant of fraud for submitting forged documents to increase bank loan limits.
XVIII K 177/18
Court convicted defendant of fraud and embezzlement, imposing prison term, fine, and partial restitution order.
II K 699/20
Court acquits attempted fraudster but convicts accomplice of attempted fraud and grants suspended sentence.
IV Ka 644/13
Court partially allows appeal, remands sentencing for lack of argumentation but upholds conviction for co-defendant.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text