Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 887/19 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction for attempted theft despite defense procedural errors.

Case Number II Ka 887/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The District Court in Siedlce upheld the first-instance conviction for attempted theft against the appellant, P. W., rejecting his appeal filed by his defense lawyer. The defense argued procedural violations under Articles 438(2) and 438(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, claiming errors in fact-finding and procedure. The appellate court found no merit in these claims and determined the first-instance judgment was legally sound and factually accurate.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 ust. 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 439 k.p.k.; The appellate court must reject an appeal if the first-instance judgment is free of procedural errors and factual mistakes that could have influenced the outcome.

Keywords

AI generated
attempted theft procedural error factual error appeal dismissal Code of Criminal Procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 438 ust. 2 k.p.k.
Art. 438 ust. 3 k.p.k.
Art. 439 k.p.k.
Art. 634 k.p.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text