Court partially allows appeal by quashing conviction for aggravated insult while dismissing assault charges due to lack of victim complaints.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court quashed the first-instance conviction for aggravated insult but dismissed charges of bodily injury and other offenses due to the absence of victim complaints. The defense argued that witness testimonies proved mutual conduct, yet the court found the specific acts of pushing and spitting constituted a violation of personal integrity. Consequently, the court upheld the finding of insult while terminating the proceedings for the remaining charges under the relevant procedural provisions.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 207 §1 kk; Art. 157 §2 kk; Art. 216 §1 kk; Art. 217 §1 kk; Art. 17 §1 pkt 9 kpk; Art. 439 §1 pkt 9 kpk; Art. 437 §2 k.p.k.; Art. 454 §1 k.p.k.; Art. 632 pkt 2 k.p.k. – When specific acts of pushing and spitting violate personal integrity without a victim complaint, the court must quash the conviction for bodily injury but may uphold a separate finding of insult if the evidence supports it.