II K 328/19
AI generated
Court sentenced defendant to combined prison term for robbery and theft, rejecting partial acquittal request.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court sentenced the defendant to a combined prison term for robbery and theft, rejecting his request for a partial acquittal on the assault charge. Although the defendant denied entering the victim's home initially, he later admitted to the assault and the taking of property, which the court deemed insufficient grounds for acquittal. The judgment upheld the conviction based on the totality of evidence and the defendant's prior criminal record.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 158 § 1 k.k.; Art. 279 § 1 k.k.; Art. 278 § 1 k.k.: A partial admission of assault does not constitute a full acquittal when the defendant's overall conduct and evidence support a conviction for robbery and theft.
Keywords
AI generated
robbery conviction
theft sentencing
partial acquittal
combined punishment
criminal record
property damage
assault charge
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 158 § 1 k.k.
Art. 279 § 1 k.k.
Art. 278 § 1 k.k.
art. 387 k.p.k
art. 279 § 1 k.k
art. 278 § 1 k.k
art. 222 §1 k.k
art. 226 §1 k.k
art. 157 §2 k.k
art. 11 §2 k.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 343/13
Court modifies robbery verdict by removing 'state of defenselessness' and correcting double time credit for defendant.
IX Ka 575/17
Criminal appeal upheld; defendant convicted of robbery with recidivism; state covers legal aid costs.
II AKa 89/14
Appellate court reduced robbery and burglary sentences for accomplices due to excessive severity and equal culpability.
II AKa 16/14
Appeal court quashes robbery conviction due to expert opinion contradictions and legal reasoning errors.
II KK 357/23
Supreme Court dismisses cassation as obviously unfounded due to improper procedural formulation of excessive penalty claim.