III RC 29/19
AI generated
Plaintiff's withdrawal of alimentary claim after trial began was permitted, dismissing the case and awarding defendant process costs.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's alimentary claim after the defendant withdrew the lawsuit following the commencement of the trial. Although the plaintiff requested no costs, the defendant's counsel failed to explicitly object to the withdrawal despite a court inquiry, which was deemed equivalent to consent. Consequently, the court ruled that the withdrawal constituted a loss of the case, ordering the plaintiff to pay the defendant's process costs and legal fees.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 203 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 355 § 1 k.p.c.: Withdrawal of a claim after the trial has begun requires the other party's consent; failure to object to such withdrawal is deemed consent, and the withdrawal is treated as a loss of the case for cost allocation purposes.
Keywords
AI generated
withdrawal of claim
consent to withdrawal
costs of proceedings
legal fees
family law
alimony
court costs
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 203 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 355 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 29 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 26 maja 1999 r. — Kodeks postępowania cywilnego
§ 3 art. 29 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
§ 4 ust. 1 pkt 9 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 r. w sprawie opłat za czynności adwokackie
§ 15 ust. 1 i ust. 3 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 r. w sprawie opłat za czynności adwokackie
art. 203 § 1 k.p.c
art. 203 § 4 k.p.c
art. 355 § 1 k.p.c