II K 390/19
AI generated
Court convicts defendant for alimentary evasion exceeding triple support amount with one year restriction sentence.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of evading alimentary obligations to two children, finding the arrears exceeded three times the monthly support amounts. The prosecution argued the defendant's actions harmed the victims' basic needs, while the defense focused on the defendant's lack of assets and income. The court upheld the conviction under Article 209 of the Criminal Code, imposing a one-year restriction of liberty and mandatory unpaid work.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 209 § 1a k.k.; Art. 91 § 1 k.k.: Evading alimentary obligations where arrears exceed three times the monthly amount constitutes a punishable offense, warranting a sentence of restriction of liberty when the defendant's conduct harms the victims' basic needs.
Keywords
AI generated
alimentary evasion
criminal conviction
restriction of liberty
support obligations
criminal code provisions
unpaid work order
family law violation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 209 § 1a k.k.
Art. 91 § 1 k.k.
Art. 34 § 1 k.k.
Art. 35 § 1 k.k.
Art. 72 § 1 pkt 3 k.k.i.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 387 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIII KK 144/07
Related Decisions
AI generatedII K 29/23
Court convicted defendant of theft and imposed a fine, restitution, and court costs based on statutory provisions.
VI Ka 210/20
Appeal against acquittal dismissed; prosecutor's factual error claim rejected; defense costs awarded to lawyer.
II AKa 293/24
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance judgment due to lack of grounds for appeal and no procedural errors affecting the verdict.
IV Ka 846/22
Court dismissed appeal against acquittal for habitual evasion of alimentary obligations due to insufficient evidence of intent.
II AKa 74/22
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance ruling on compensation for wrongful detention due to procedural errors.