Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VI Pa 36/19 AI generated

Employee's claim for personality rights violation dismissed as no health disorder caused by workplace mobbing.

Case Number VI Pa 36/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the employee's claim for damages regarding personality rights violations stemming from workplace mobbing. Although the plaintiff argued that the employer's conduct violated personal dignity under the Civil Code, the defendant contended that no specific health disorder was proven. The court ruled that without a diagnosed health disorder caused by the mobbing, the statutory conditions for compensation under the relevant articles were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 23, 24 k.p.c.; Art. 300 k.p.; Art. 94 ze zn. 3 par. 3 k.p.: An employee may claim damages for personality rights violations only if the employer's conduct caused a specific health disorder.

Keywords

AI generated
personality rights violation workplace mobbing health disorder requirement employee compensation claim civil code provisions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 23 k.p.c.
Pracownik może dochodzić roszczeń za naruszenie dóbr osobistych zgodnie z art. 23 i 24 kpc w zw.
Art. 24 k.p.c.
Art. 300 k.p.
z art. 300 kp jeśli mobbing stosowany przez pracodawcę nie wywołał u niego rozstroju zdrowia ( art.
Art. 94 ze zn. 3 par. 3 k.p.
300 kp jeśli mobbing stosowany przez pracodawcę nie wywołał u niego rozstroju zdrowia ( art. 94 ze zn.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pracownik może dochodzić roszczeń za naruszenie dóbr osobistych zgodnie z art. 23 i 24 kpc w zw. z art. 300 kp jeśli mobbing stosowany przez pracodawcę nie wywołał u niego rozstroju zdrowia ( art. 94 ze zn. 3 par.3 kp )