VI K 228/18
AI generated
Court dismisses theft charge for fallen timber where defendant lacked intent to permanently deprive owner of property.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the defendant's charge of theft regarding fallen timber, ruling that the prosecution failed to prove the requisite intent to permanently deprive the owner. The defendant argued the wood was abandoned, while the prosecution claimed it was still owned by the forest service. The court determined that without evidence of the specific intent to appropriate the property, the elements of theft were not met.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedUstawa o karych i postępkach karnych; Art. 179 k.k.: Theft requires specific intent to permanently deprive the owner of property, which is absent when the accused merely takes possession of abandoned or fallen items without such intent.
Keywords
AI generated
theft of fallen timber
intent to deprive
abandoned property
criminal intent
forest service ownership
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 179 k.k.
Full text
oskarżonego o to, że dokonał zaboru w celu przywłaszczenia drewna powalonego...