II K 84/19
AI generated
Court convicts two defendants of forgery for falsifying a safety inspection protocol regarding a construction scaffold.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Regional Court in Giżycko convicted two defendants of forgery for creating a false technical inspection protocol for a construction scaffold. The prosecution argued that the defendants knowingly presented a document with incorrect dates and signatures to the Labor Inspectorate following a workplace accident. The court found the defendants guilty of direct intent, noting their stable lifestyle and lack of prior criminal record as mitigating factors for the fine amount.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 270 § 1 k.k.; Art. 33 § 1, 3 k.k.: The court established that knowingly presenting a document containing false data regarding the execution of a technical inspection constitutes the crime of forgery, punishable by a fine when the actor acts with direct intent.
Keywords
AI generated
crime of forgery
false document
technical inspection protocol
direct intent
workplace accident
construction scaffold
criminal fine
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 270 § 1 k.k.
Art. 33 § 1 k.k.
Art. 33 § 3 k.k.
Art. 633 k.p.k.
Art. 616 § 2 k.p.k.
Art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 387 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII K 581/20
Court acquits defendants of false certification due to unresolvable evidentiary doubts regarding the protocol's authenticity.
II K 451/20
Court acquits defendant of intentional fraud due to lack of proven subjective intent regarding ventilation defects.
VIII Ka 576/15
Court modifies conviction for falsifying documents to fraud, reducing sentence to 10 months with probation.
I KA 21/23
Supreme Court upheld conviction for falsifying documents by confirming work completion despite known defects in a military contract.
IV P 313/19
Dismissal of employee's wrongful dismissal claim due to gross negligence in signing incomplete construction acceptance protocols.