I C 2164/18 AI generated

Court dismissed energy supply contract claims, ruling price hikes were normal market risks assumed by the professional plaintiff.

Case Number I C 2164/18

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2019-12-23

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claims against multiple public entities seeking to increase energy supply contract rates. The plaintiff argued that rising energy prices were unforeseeable, but the court found such fluctuations to be normal market risks inherent in professional contracting. Consequently, the plaintiff was ordered to pay the defendants' legal costs as the losing party.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 357 § 1 k.c.; Art. 235 § 1 k.p.c.: Changes in commodity prices resulting from global market fluctuations constitute normal contractual risks that a professional party must anticipate and price into the contract, thereby barring claims for judicial modification or termination.

Keywords

AI generated

contractual risk allocation energy supply contracts market price fluctuations professional party liability freedom of contract public procurement disputes judicial modification of contracts

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 357 § 1 k.c.

Art. 235 § 1 k.p.c.

Art. 98 k.p.c.

§ 2 pkt 6 i 7 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 roku w sprawie opłat za czynności radców prawnych

art. 235§1 k.p.c

art. 98 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Appeal dismissed; tenant's claim for rent and improvements rejected due to statute of limitations and lease terms.

Court dismissed contractor's claim for price adjustment due to unforeseen material cost increases under Polish law.

Sąd Okręgowy w Szczecinie

V ACa 409/10

Supreme Court allows hospital's claim against health fund for statutory wage increase costs under Civil Code.

AI generated

XVII AmE 139/21

Consumer court dismissed appeal against energy regulator's decision to suspend electricity supply due to unpaid bills.

Civil court dismissed claim to modify public procurement contract price citing budgetary constraints and final performance.

Court dismissed public tender contract dispute over energy price increase citing contractual risk.

Powódka Gmina S. wniosła o zasądzenie od pozwanej (...) Sp. z o. o. z siedzibą we W. kwoty 112.612,51 zł wraz z odsetkami ustawowymi za opóźnienie liczonymi od 7 marca 2019 roku do dnia zapłaty oraz kosztów postępowania, w tym kosztów zastępstwa procesowego według norm przepisanych lub według przedłożonego spisu kosztów, w tym 17 zł opłaty skarbowej od pełnomocnictwa.

Full text