Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II K 116/19 AI generated

Court imposes combined fine for fraudulently manipulating employment records to defraud social benefits.

Case Number II K 116/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court convicted the defendant of fraudulently manipulating employment records to defraud social benefits and imposed a combined fine of 250 daily units. The prosecution alleged the defendant falsified attendance and pay documents to claim refunds for work hours not actually performed, violating the rights of an employee. The court found the evidence sufficient to prove intentional misconduct and applied a mixed sentencing principle, balancing the defendant's lack of prior record and full restitution against the severity of the fraud.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 286 § 1 k.k.; Art. 270 § 1 k.k.; Art. 218 § 1a k.k.; Art. 91 § 1 k.k.; Art. 37a k.k.; Art. 33 § 1, 3 k.k.; Art. 568a § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.; Art. 85 § 1, 2 k.k.; Art. 85a k.k.; Art. 86 § 1, 2 k.k.; Art. 91 § 2 k.k.: The court established that intentional falsification of employment documents to obtain financial benefits constitutes fraud, warranting a combined fine when multiple acts are linked by subject and object.

Keywords

AI generated
fraudulent employment records social benefits fraud combined criminal fine mixed sentencing principle intentional document forgery labor law violation financial restitution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 286 § 1 k.k.
Art. 270 § 1 k.k.
Art. 218 § 1a k.k.
Art. 91 § 1 k.k.
Art. 37a k.k.
Art. 33 § 1, 3 k.k.
Art. 568a § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.
Art. 85 § 1, 2 k.k.
Art. 85a k.k.
Art. 86 § 1, 2 k.k.
Art. 91 § 2 k.k.
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text