Consumer contract voided for omitting risk information on complex financial product polisolokata.

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim seeking contract termination based on the omission of risk information regarding a polisolokata financial product. The plaintiff argued that the bank failed to disclose specific risks, violating consumer protection duties, while the bank contended the disclosure was adequate under the contract terms. The court ruled that without evidence proving the omission caused the consumer's detriment or that the information was essential for the decision, the claim lacked legal basis.