II K 102/19
AI generated
Court convicts defendant of property misappropriation and imposes sentence under recidivism provision.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of property misappropriation and imposed a seven-month prison sentence. The defendant argued that the prosecution's description of the payment method was inaccurate, but the court rejected this claim. The court applied the recidivism provision because the defendant committed a similar crime within five years of serving a prior sentence.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 286 § 1 kk; Art. 64 § 1 kk: When a person convicted of an intentional crime commits a similar intentional crime within five years after serving at least six months of the previous sentence, the court may impose a sentence up to the statutory maximum increased by half.
Keywords
AI generated
property misappropriation
recidivism provision
intentional crime
prison sentence
civil compensation
court costs waiver
defense argument
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 286 § 1 kk
Art. 64 § 1 kk
Art. 46 § 1 kk
Art. 624 § 1 kpk
Art. 17 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23.06.1973r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
Art. 618 § 1 pkt 11 kpk
Cited Case Law
AI generatedSąd Rejonowy w Mławie z dnia 21.07.2010r. w sprawie IIK 277/10
Related Decisions
AI generatedII K 1002/23
Court convicted defendant of fraud for online scam, imposing prison term and restitution due to recidivism.
V KK 141/22
Supreme Court quashes criminal sentence for restitution obligation when victim's loss was already repaired before judgment.
II K 1288/23
Court convicted defendant of fraud under lesser weight clause and ordered restitution for 480 PLN loss.
II K 1291/22
Jeżeli wniosek o uzasadnienie wyroku dotyczy tylko niektórych czynów lub niektórych oskarżonych, sąd może ograniczyć uzasadnienie do części wyroku objętych wnioskiem.
II K 306/23
Court convicted defendant of fraud for online scam, imposing suspended sentence due to prior record.