IV Ka 616/13
AI generated
Court upheld traffic fine for speeding, rejecting appeal on evidence and sentencing grounds.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the defendant's appeal against a second-instance traffic fine for speeding. The defendant argued the radar measurement was flawed and that the court failed to hold a hearing due to scheduling issues. The court rejected these claims, noting the defendant had no grounds to challenge the radar's accuracy and was responsible for arriving at the hearing on time.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 92a k.w.; Art. 24 § 1 k.w.; The court is not bound by the tariff of traffic fines when sentencing for speeding under Art. 92a k.w., provided the penalty falls within the statutory range and is proportionate to the social harm caused.
Keywords
AI generated
speeding offense
traffic fine
radar measurement
proportionality of penalty
second instance appeal
hearing attendance
discretionary sentencing
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 92a k.w.
Art. 24 § 1 k.w.
Art. 437 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 109 § 2 k.p.w.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 119 k.p.w.
Ustawa z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 roku o opłatach w sprawach karnych