Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
IV U 139/19 AI generated

Court cannot contradict expert medical opinion on factual assessment without new evidence.

Case Number IV U 139/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court upheld the expert medical opinion regarding the defendant's fitness for trial. The court reasoned that it lacks the authority to form a contrary factual assessment based solely on its own evaluation. Consequently, the court was bound to accept the expert's findings as the definitive factual basis for the proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 237 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 238 § 1 k.p.k.: The court cannot adopt a factual assessment differing from that of expert witnesses based on its own independent evaluation of the same facts.

Keywords

AI generated
expert medical opinion factual assessment court authority fitness for trial independent evaluation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 237 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 238 § 1 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

przy ocenie biegłych lekarzy Sąd nie może zająć stanowiska odmiennego, niż wyrażone w tej opinii, na podstawie własnej oceny stanu faktycznego