Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I C 1717/18 AI generated

Court rejects defendant's claim that unpaid remuneration is accessory security, ruling it an integral part of the fee.

Case Number I C 1717/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court accepted the plaintiff's argument that unpaid remuneration constitutes an integral part of the fee rather than accessory security. The defendant contended that such payments should be treated as separate security deposits subject to different legal rules. Consequently, the court ruled that the payment is inseparable from the main debt, invalidating the defendant's classification of it as accessory security.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o postępowaniu cywilnym; Ustawa o ochronie konsumentów: The court established that unpaid remuneration for contract performance is an integral part of the fee and does not constitute accessory security.

Keywords

AI generated
unpaid remuneration accessory security contract performance integral part civil procedure consumer protection security deposit

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ustawa o postępowaniu cywilnym
Ustawa o ochronie konsumentów

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Wbrew stanowisku pozwanego, Sąd przyjął iż część niezapłaconego powódce wynagrodzenia, należnego z tytułu wykonywania umowy, nie stanowi kaucji gwarancyjnej, która ma - co do zasady - charakter akcesoryjny wobec wynagrodzenia, lecz stanowi niepodzielną i integralną jego część.