II K 269/19
AI generated
Court convicted defendant of embezzlement for failing to return leased machinery after contract termination.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of embezzlement for failing to return leased machinery after the lessor validly terminated the contract. The defendant admitted guilt and argued for a lighter sentence based on his difficult life situation, while the prosecution emphasized the significant social harm and prior criminal record. The court accepted the facts, imposed a six-month prison sentence, and ordered restitution of the full machine value plus state fees.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 284 § 2 k.k.; Art. 46 § 1 k.k.: The court established that knowingly failing to return leased property after a valid contract termination constitutes embezzlement, warranting criminal punishment and civil restitution.
Keywords
AI generated
embezzlement
lease contract
criminal conviction
civil restitution
contract termination
property return
prison sentence
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 284 § 2 k.k.
Art. 46 § 1 k.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 2 pkt. 2 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 roku o opłatach w sprawach karnych
Art. 618 § 1 pkt. 1 k.p.k.
Art. 618 § 1 pkt. 10 k.p.k.
art. 284 § 2 k.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedIII K 51/14
Court convicts defendant of embezzlement under recidivism rules, imposing prison time and restitution.
X K 61/14
Court applies older Criminal Code to defendant due to less favorable current compensation rules regarding interest.
II Ka 85/17
Court dismissed appeal against prison sentence for embezzlement, ruling it was not unreasonably severe.
III K 181/23
Court convicts defendant of misappropriating leased construction equipment and imposes suspended sentence with restitution.
II AKa 393/17
Appeal court quashed criminal restitution order due to pending civil debt collection proceedings under anticumulation rule.