Bus driver's failure to work full time after 2009 denied bridge pension rights under Polish law.

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for a bridge pension, ruling that the defendant failed to prove continuous full-time employment as a bus driver after January 1, 2009. The plaintiff argued that temporary work interruptions did not break the continuity required for pension eligibility, while the defendant contended that the statutory requirement for full-time service was strictly met. The court held that the evidence demonstrated a lack of continuous full-time performance, thereby legally precluding the award of the bridge pension.