Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VI ACa 96/18 AI generated

Court held that a judge cannot decide on the type of protection granted, only on the request's qualification and procedure.

Case Number VI ACa 96/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's request, ruling that while judges must properly qualify and process asylum applications, they cannot determine the specific type of protection to grant. The plaintiff argued for a particular form of legal protection, but the court emphasized that the list of persons in Article 951 § 1 of the Civil Code is closed. Consequently, the decision was based on the separation of procedural qualification from substantive protection determination.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 951 § 1 k.c.; The court cannot decide on the type of protection granted in a specific case, as it must only qualify the request and recognize it in the proper procedure.

Keywords

AI generated
asylum procedure protection type judicial power closed list civil code procedural qualification substantive decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 951 § 1 k.c.
Lista osób wyliczonych w art. 951 § 1 k.c. ma charakter zamknięty.
art. 951 § 1 k.c
Lista osób wyliczonych w art. 951 § 1 k.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

1. To powód jest gospodarzem procesu i o ile sąd może, i powinien właściwie zakwalifikować żądanie, z którym występuje osoba poszukująca ochrony prawnej, i rozpoznać je we właściwym trybie, o tyle nie może sam decydować o tym, jakiej ochrony w konkretnym przypadku udzielić. 2. Lista osób wyliczonych w art. 951 § 1 k.c. ma charakter zamknięty.