III K 644/17
AI generated
Court partially acquitted defendant of one fraud charge but convicted and sentenced for two other counts of deception.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court acquitted the defendant of the third charge regarding victim Z. K. but convicted him of the first two charges involving victims B. M. and M. Ł. The prosecution alleged the defendant impersonated a police officer to defraud victims of over 130,000 PLN across three incidents. The court found the evidence insufficient for the third count but established guilt for the first two based on the defendant's deceptive conduct and financial loss.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 286 § 1 k.k.; Art. 85 k.k.; Art. 86 § 1 k.k.; Art. 63 § 1 k.k.; Art. 46 § 1 k.k. - The court may acquit a defendant of specific charges while convicting on others if evidence supports guilt for some but not all alleged acts, requiring separate evaluation of each criminal fact.
Keywords
AI generated
fraudulent deception
police impersonation
partial acquittal
combined punishment
property damage
criminal liability
evidence insufficiency
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 286 § 1 k.k.
Art. 85 k.k.
Art. 86 § 1 k.k.
Art. 63 § 1 k.k.
Art. 46 § 1 k.k.
Art. 230 § 2 k.p.k.
Art. 44 § 2 k.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 286 § 1 k.k
art. 85 k.k