I C 231/18
AI generated
Court dismissed gift revocation claim due to missed one-year statute of limitations for notice. Plaintiff failed to notify donee within one year of discovering ingratitude.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claim to revoke a gift made to her daughter, ruling that the statutory one-year period for revocation had expired. Although the plaintiff alleged the daughter's ingratitude after cutting off contact, she failed to provide written notice to the donee within the required timeframe. Consequently, the court held that the revocation was invalid and ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs of the proceedings.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 1020 k.c.; Art. 1021 k.c.: A revocation of a gift based on ingratitude requires a written notice to the donee served within one year of the donor discovering the grounds for revocation; failure to meet this deadline renders the revocation ineffective.
Keywords
AI generated
gift revocation
statute of limitations
written notice
ingratitude
civil procedure
one year period
donee notification
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 1020 k.c.
Art. 1021 k.c.
Art. 113 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
art. 102 k.p.c.
§ 8 punktu 6 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 3 października 2016r.
art. 898 § 1 k.c
art. 6 k.c
art. 899 § 3 k.c
art. 102 k.p.c
art. 98 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedpostanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 14 stycznia 1974 r., II CZ 223/73
postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 13 października 1976r., IV PZ 61/76
Related Decisions
AI generatedI C 1173/11
Court dismissed inheritance dispute over alleged ingratitude, citing family conflicts rather than malicious intent.
I C 739/13
Court dismissed claim for revocation of gift due to lack of egregious ingratitude by recipient.
I ACa 586/13
Appeal dismissed; family conflicts and rent disputes do not constitute legal grounds for revoking a gift due to ingratitude.
I C 286/18
Court dismisses claim for revocation of land gift due to lack of proven outrageous ingratitude.
I C 428/18
Court dismisses life-tenancy termination claim as parties still maintain necessary proximity for the relationship.