Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I C 2329/17 AI generated

Court rules option agreement is not a gambling debt but a valid contract under freedom of contract.

Case Number I C 2329/17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the claim that the option agreement constituted a gambling debt, ruling instead that it was a valid contract. The plaintiff argued the agreement was a game of chance, while the defendant contended it fell under the freedom of contract principle. The court decided the agreement contained all necessary terms to be recognized as a standard commercial contract rather than a wager.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o ochronie konsumentów; Umowa opcji nie jest roszczeniem z gry i zakładu, lecz ważnym umową opartą na swobodzie umów.

Keywords

AI generated
option agreement freedom of contract gambling debt consumer protection valid contract natural obligation civil liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Act on Consumer Protection

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Umowa opcji nie ma charakteru zobowiązania naturalnego. Nie jest roszczeniem z gry i zakładu. Umowa ta zawiera wszelkie postanowienia, niezbędne do uznania, że mieści się one w realiach prawnych zasady swobody umów.