Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V GC 1650/18 AI generated

Insurance company must prove replacement car rental duration was shorter and rate was inflated.

Case Number V GC 1650/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court ruled that the insurance company bears the burden of proving the replacement vehicle rental period was shorter than claimed and the rate was inflated. The plaintiff argued for a specific rental duration and cost, while the defendant failed to provide evidence contradicting these figures. Consequently, the court partially allowed the plaintiff's claims regarding the rental terms and pricing.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Insurance Act; Civil Code: The insurer must prove the replacement vehicle rental period was shorter than claimed and the rental rate was inflated to reduce liability.

Keywords

AI generated
Insurance Act replacement vehicle rental period inflated rate burden of proof civil liability insurance dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Insurance Act
Civil Code

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Na pozwanym Zakładzie Ubezpieczeniowym ciąży obowiązek wykazania, że czas najmu pojazdu zastępczego powinien być krótszy niż ten, o którym mowa w pozwie, a także, że stawka najmu była wygórowana.