Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III RC 139/18 AI generated

Family law aspect does not override property rights interpretation under Article 52 of the Civil Code.

Case Number III RC 139/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's request to interpret Article 52 of the Civil Code in a manner favoring family law considerations. The plaintiff argued that the provision should be read through a family law lens, while the defendant contended for a strict property rights interpretation. The court ruled that the provision's nature is primarily economic, thereby rejecting the family law argument.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 52 k.c.; The court held that the provision's nature is primarily economic, meaning family law considerations do not override its interpretation regarding property rights.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Code Article 52 property rights interpretation family law aspect economic nature of provision legal interpretation standard

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 52 k.c.
Nie sfera o charakterze rodzinno-prawnym, lecz aspekt prawno-majątkowy ma istotne znaczenie przy wykładni art. 52 kro

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Nie sfera o charakterze rodzinno-prawnym, lecz aspekt prawno-majątkowy ma istotne znaczenie przy wykładni art. 52 kro