IV Ka 17/14
AI generated
Court dismissed appeal against conviction for impersonating a building inspector, upholding the first-instance verdict on evidence and intent.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal, upholding the first-instance conviction for impersonating a building inspector. The defendant argued that the court improperly weighed evidence and failed to consider his private investigations, but the court found the witness testimony reliable and the defendant's intent clear. Consequently, the conviction and the fine were maintained as legally sound.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 61 § 1 k.w.; Art. 7 k.p.k. w zw. z art. 8 k.p.s.w.; Art. 438 pkt. 3 k.p.k.: An appeal based on alleged factual errors is inadmissible if the first instance court correctly evaluated the evidence and the defendant's intent is clearly established by the facts found.
Keywords
AI generated
impersonation of official
building inspector
criminal offense
appeal dismissal
evidence evaluation
direct intent
factual findings
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 61 § 1 k.w.
Art. 7 k.p.k. w zw. z art. 8 k.p.s.w.
Art. 410 k.p.k. w zw. z art. 82 § 1 k.p.s.w.
Art. 438 pkt. 3 k.p.k.
Art. 119 k.p.ow.
Art. 636 § 1 k.w.
Art. 3 ust. 1 w zw. z art. 21 pkt. 2 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 roku o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 424 k.p.k
art. 7 k.p.k
art. 410 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedII KR 355/74 OSNPG 1975/9/84
I KR 197/74 OSNKW 1975/5/58
II Akr 1/92 OSA 1992/6/41
II Akr 134/92 OSA 1992/11/55
II AKa 138/00 Prok. i Pr. 2002/1/28