Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VIII U 899/18 AI generated

Formal employment contract without Art. 22 Kp prerequisites does not imply mandatory employee insurance coverage.

Case Number VIII U 899/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the employer's claim for employee insurance coverage despite a formal employment contract. The employer argued that the contract was valid, but the court found it lacked the prerequisites of Article 22 of the Social Security Code. Consequently, the court ruled that performing acts for a non-qualifying payer does not automatically trigger mandatory insurance obligations.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 22 ust. 1 Kp; Art. 18 ust. 1 Kp: A formal employment contract does not imply mandatory employee insurance coverage if the payer fails to meet the prerequisites of Article 22 of the Social Security Code.

Keywords

AI generated
Social Security Code employment contract prerequisites employee insurance coverage payer qualification mandatory insurance obligation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 22 ust. 1 Kp
Art. 18 ust. 1 Kp

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

wykonywanie czynności na rzecz płatnika nie spełniających przesłanek art.22 kp, mimo zawarcia formalnej umowy o pracę, nie implikuje ubezpieczenia pracowniczego