Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VII AGa 541/18 AI generated

Court must admit further expert opinion only if it contains significant gaps or fails to address proven issues.

Case Number VII AGa 541/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court ruled that admitting a supplementary expert opinion is mandatory only when the existing opinion contains material gaps or fails to address the specific issues raised. The plaintiff argued the initial report was insufficient, while the defense contended it was comprehensive. The court decided that without such deficiencies, the additional evidence would be superfluous and thus not required.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 220 k.p.k.; The court is obligated to admit further expert evidence solely when the existing opinion contains significant gaps or fails to adequately address the issues put forward by the parties.

Keywords

AI generated
expert opinion admissibility material gaps in evidence procedural necessity supplementary expert report burden of proof court discretion evidence sufficiency

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 220 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sąd ma obowiązek dopuszczenia dowodu z dalszej opinii jedynie wtedy , gdy zachodzi taka potrzeba, a więc gdy opinia zawiera istotne luki, bo nie odpowiada na postawione tezy dowodowe, jest niejasna.