I C 500/10
AI generated
Court dismissed plaintiff's claim to terminate increased needs pension due to lack of significant change in condition.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's lawsuit seeking to terminate the obligation to pay an increased needs pension. The plaintiff argued for cessation of payments, but the defendants maintained that their physical condition from a 2000 accident remained unchanged. The court ruled that no significant change in circumstances occurred between the original 2003 judgment and the 2010 filing, thereby rejecting the request under Article 907 of the Civil Code.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 907 § 2 k.c.; The court does not re-examine liability prerequisites but strictly assesses whether a significant change in circumstances justifies modifying the pension amount or duration.
Keywords
AI generated
increased needs pension
change of circumstances
termination of obligation
civil liability
pension modification
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 907 § 2 k.c.
Art. 98 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 113 ust. 1 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
art. 907 § 2 k.c
art. 98 § 1 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedI ACa 476/23
Court partially allowed disability pension appeal, increasing monthly amount and awarding back pay for delay.
I C 522/21
Court partially allowed pension increase claim for increased needs while dismissing excess care cost claims.
II Ca 768/18
Appeal dismissed; court rejected claim for increased pension due to lack of proven worsening health needs.
I C 664/13
Court partially allowed compensation for disability and increased expenses while dismissing unproven claims against social insurance company.
I C 202/20
Court awards increased capitalization rent and monthly disability rent to minor passenger injured in car accident.