V ACa 655/17
AI generated
Appeal court dismisses plaintiff claims and orders them to pay the defendant's legal costs in a land use dispute.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the plaintiffs' claims for compensation regarding unauthorized land use and ordered them to pay the defendant's legal costs. The plaintiffs argued for damages based on the duration of the land use, while the defendant contested the validity of the claims. The court ruled against the plaintiffs, rejecting their arguments and shifting the financial burden of both first and second instance proceedings to them.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 386 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 98 § 1 i 3 k.p.c.; Art. 109 § 2 k.p.c.: The court dismisses the plaintiff's claim for compensation and orders the plaintiff to bear the defendant's legal costs when the claim is rejected.
Keywords
AI generated
unauthorized land use
compensation claim
legal costs allocation
civil appeal procedure
state plaintiff liability
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 386 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 98 § 1 i 3 k.p.c.
Art. 99 k.p.c.
Art. 83 ust. 2 u.k.s.c.
Art. 94 u.k.s.c.
Art. 113 ust. 1 u.k.s.c.
§ 6 pkt 7 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 28 września 2002 r.
§ 21 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 r.
Art. 109 § 2 k.p.c.
§ 2 ust. 1 powołanego już rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 28 września 2002 r.
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedI C 279/21
Court allows claim for unauthorized use of land, adjusting expert valuation to plaintiff's request amount.
I1 C 458/23
Court dismissed defendant's statute of limitations defense, ruling claim valid due to lack of property return.
II Ca 761/15
Appeal dismissed; court upheld lower court's free use fee award against state entity for land occupation.
I ACa 172/14
Court dismisses claim for unjust enrichment due to valid administrative permit overriding civil law arguments.