Criminal appeal dismissed for facts but allowed regarding sentencing due to significantly limited capacity to understand and control behavior.

The appellate court dismissed the defendant's appeal regarding the factual findings of guilt for disturbing the peace but allowed the request to avoid criminal punishment. The defendant argued that his hearing impairment and lack of prior record warranted leniency, while the prosecution contended the evidence of misconduct was sufficient. The court agreed that although the facts were established, the defendant's significantly limited capacity to understand and control his actions under Article 17 of the Criminal Code justified waiving the penalty.