IX Ka 1882/13
AI generated
Appeal dismissed; court upheld acquittal as evidence failed to prove water diversion. Defendant acquitted of water law violation.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court dismissed the appeal filed by the private prosecutor against the first-instance acquittal of the defendant. The defendant was charged with altering water flow by placing concrete beams, but evidence showed no actual diversion occurred. The court upheld the acquittal because witness testimonies and site inspections failed to prove the alleged change in water direction.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 194 § 1 Prawa wodnego; Art. 109 § 2 k.p.w. in zw. z Art. 437 § 1 k.p.k.: An acquittal stands when the appellate court finds that the first-instance court correctly evaluated evidence and failed to find facts necessary for conviction.
Keywords
AI generated
water law violation
acquittal upheld
appellate review
evidence evaluation
private prosecutor appeal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 194 § 1 Prawa wodnego
Art. 109 § 2 k.p.w.
Art. 437 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 119 k.p.w.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 13 ust. 2 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych z dnia 23.06.1973r.