IV Ka 1091/18
AI generated
Court partially allowed appeal, striking one-year driving ban for minor traffic negligence.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court partially overturned the first-instance judgment, striking the one-year driving ban while upholding the 300 zł fine. The defendant argued the ban was disproportionate and violated procedural rights by relying on expert opinions without proper evidence. The court agreed the ban was excessive for a simple lack of caution, noting the driver was experienced and the incident did not warrant total exclusion from traffic.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 86 § 1 k.w.; Art. 23 ust. 1 pkt 3 Prawo o Ruchu Drogowym; The driving ban is disproportionate for minor negligence and must be struck if it exceeds the necessity to ensure road safety.
Keywords
AI generated
driving ban proportionality
traffic negligence appeal
disproportionate sanction
road safety assessment
appellate review standard
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 86 § 1 k.w.
Art. 23 ust. 1 pkt 3 Prawo o Ruchu Drogowym
Art. 193 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 42 k.p.w.
Related Decisions
AI generatedVI Ka 931/17
Wyrokiem z dnia 7 września 2017 roku w sprawie o sygnaturze akt III W 1647/16 Sąd Rejonowy w Gliwicach uznał obwinionego P.
VI Ka 372/14
Court dismissed appeal against traffic offense conviction, upholding first-instance verdict on negligence and costs.
VI Ka 541/14
Appeal court reduced driver ban duration from three to two years due to lack of prior record.
II Ka 581/13
został oskarżony o to, że w dniu 25 lipca 2012 r.
II Ka 70/15
Dnia 8 października 2014 r.