IV Ka 68/14
AI generated
Court upheld conviction for disturbing night rest by renting a venue for loud music parties.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court upheld the first-instance judgment convicting A. M. of disturbing night rest under Article 51 § 1 of the Noise Act. The defendant argued that the noise did not sufficiently disturb the victims' sleep and that the court erred in evaluating witness testimony and evidence. The court rejected these claims, finding that renting the venue for loud music constituted an acceptance of the disturbance, and the penalty appropriately balanced aggravating and mitigating circumstances.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 51 § 1 k.w.; Art. 4 k.p.k.; Art. 7 k.p.k. w zw. z art. 8 k.p.w.; The court established that renting a venue for loud music constitutes an acceptance of the disturbance of night rest, thereby fulfilling the subjective element of the offense.
Keywords
AI generated
disturbing night rest
noise pollution
rental of venue
subjective intent
appellate review
noise act
criminal liability
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 51 § 1 k.w.
art. 4 k.p.k.
art. 7 k.p.k. w zw. z art. 8 k.p.w.
art. 437 § 1 kpk
art. 109 § 2 kpw
art. 636 § 1 kpk w zw. z art. 119 kpw
art. 8 i art. 21 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 roku o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 4 k.p.k
art. 7 k.p.k
art. 8 k.p