Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
XI W 391/17 AI generated

Court dismisses claim for 'similar benefit' regarding nightclub activity, ruling it does not meet legal criteria.

Case Number XI W 391/17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for a similar benefit related to the defendant's nightclub activity. The plaintiff argued that the specific nature of the business warranted comparable treatment under the relevant social security provisions. The court rejected this, finding that the activity did not constitute a 'similar benefit' as defined by the statute.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 10 ust. 1 ustawy o ubezpieczeniach społecznych; Art. 10 ust. 2 ustawy o ubezpieczeniach społecznych: The concept of 'another similar benefit' excludes activities where the primary purpose is the organization of nightlife events, as they do not share the essential characteristics of the referenced benefits.

Keywords

AI generated
similar benefit nightclub activity social security law benefit equivalence discretionary assessment statutory interpretation exclusion criteria

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 10 ust. 1 ustawy o ubezpieczeniach społecznych
Art. 10 ust. 2 ustawy o ubezpieczeniach społecznych

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

pojęcie "innego podobnego świadczenia" w odniesieniu do działalności klubu nocnego