II K 351/18
AI generated
Court convicts defendant of electricity theft and imposes a fine based on statutory provisions.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court found the defendant guilty of electricity theft and imposed a fine of 60 daily units. The prosecution proved the crime through an unchallenged utility inspection and the defendant's own confession. The court accepted the evidence as reliable and determined the fine was appropriate given the defendant's age, pension status, and lack of prior criminal record.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 278 § 1 i 5 k.k.; Art. 37a k.k.; Art. 33 § 1 i 3 k.k.: The court established that when a defendant confesses to the crime and the evidence is undisputed, a conviction is valid, and the sentence must consider the defendant's personal circumstances and the settlement reached.
Keywords
AI generated
electricity theft
confession of guilt
utility inspection
criminal fine
rehabilitation of offender
settlement agreement
procedural economy
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 278 § 1 i 5 k.k.
Art. 37a k.k.
Art. 33 § 1 i 3 k.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
Related Decisions
AI generatedXII Ga 371/17
Zaskarżonym wyrokiem z dnia 27 stycznia 2017 r.
VIII Ka 264/13
został oskarżony o to, że w okresie od 17 lipca 2012 roku do 05 września 2012 roku w (...) Sąd Rejonowy w Białymstoku wyrokiem z dnia 11 lutego 2013 roku w sprawie sygn.
II K 909/15
Court convicted defendant of electricity theft and sentenced to community service with state cost coverage.
III Ca 860/13
Wyrokiem z dnia 18.06.2013 r.
IV Ka 421/13
Court dismisses appeal for theft of electricity where defendant admitted guilt and health claims were unproven.