VI Ka 1092/17
AI generated
Court dismisses traffic offense appeal due to statute of limitations expiration under Polish Criminal Code.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal against a first-instance conviction for traffic offenses. The defendant argued for a retrial, but the court found that the criminal liability for the acts had expired by the time of the second-instance judgment. Consequently, the court declared the proceedings against the defendant terminated.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 45 § 1, 2 k.k.; Art. 86 § 1 k.k.; Art. 17 § 1 pkt 6 k.p.k.: When criminal liability expires, the court of appeal must quash the first-instance judgment and terminate the proceedings.
Keywords
AI generated
statute of limitations
criminal liability expiration
traffic offense
proceedings termination
second instance appeal
Polish Criminal Code
quashing judgment
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 45 § 1, 2 k.k.
Art. 86 § 1 k.k.
Art. 17 § 1 pkt 6 k.p.k.
Related Decisions
AI generatedVI Ka 56/16
Court dismissed traffic offense appeal but granted exemption from fine due to victim's sudden braking.
II Ka 38/19
Court dismissed appeal against traffic offense conviction, upholding evidence sufficiency and procedural compliance.
IX Ka 851/13
Court dismissed appeal against traffic violation verdict, upholding free evidence assessment and factual findings.
IX Ka 798/13
Court acquits defendant of traffic offense due to insufficient evidence proving negligence in ambiguous accident scenario.
XVII Ka 1145/16
Court partially allowed appeal, reducing fine for traffic offense due to changed facts and mitigating circumstances.