III K 150/17 AI generated

Court sentenced defendant to two years for drug trafficking and one year for possession, offsetting prior detention time.

Case Number III K 150/17

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2018-03-28

Outcome Allowed / Granted

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court convicted the defendant of trafficking and possessing significant quantities of amphetamine, sentencing him to two and one years of imprisonment respectively. The prosecution argued for strict application of the Narcotics Act, while the defense requested leniency and cost waivers. The court applied statutory mitigation, offset the defendant's pre-trial detention against the sentence, and exempted him from court costs due to his indigency.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii art. 55 ust. 3; Ustawa o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii art. 62 ust. 2; Ustawa karna art. 63 § 1; Ustawa o opłatach w sprawach karnych art. 17 ust. 1: The court may impose combined sentences for drug trafficking and possession, offset prior detention time against the term, and exempt indigent defendants from court costs.

Keywords

AI generated

drug trafficking amphetamine possession sentencing mitigation detention offset court costs waiver indigency exemption Narcotics Act

Cited Legislation

AI generated

art. 55 ust. 3 Ustawy z dnia 29 lipca 2005 roku o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii

art. 62 ust. 2 Ustawy z dnia 29 lipca 2005 roku o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii

art. 60 § 2 K.k.

art. 60 § 6 punktem 2) K.k.

art. 63 § 1 K.k.

art. 70 ust. 4 ustawy z dnia 29 lipca 2005 roku o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii

art. 70 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 29 lipca 2005 roku o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii

art. 387 K.p.k.

art. 624 § 1 K.p.k.

art. 17 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 roku o opłatach w sprawach karnych

AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses drug trafficking appeal as obviously groundless due to reliable confession and witness testimony.

Criminal appeal dismissed; evidence doubts resolved by court under burden of proof rules.

Supreme Court dismisses appeal due to procedural errors in fact-finding regarding drug distribution dates and victims.

Appeal court corrects clerical error citing wrong drug possession article and upholds first instance verdict against minors.

Appeal court upheld drug trafficking conviction for joint crime, rejecting appeal on sentencing proportionality grounds.

Full text