Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VII AGa 881/18 AI generated

Filing a lawsuit during the service period preserves the hearing date regardless of when the defendant receives the summons.

Case Number VII AGa 881/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court ruled that the hearing date set under Article 129(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure remains valid if the plaintiff files a lawsuit during its pendency. The defendant argued that the date should be reset upon receipt of the summons, but the court rejected this. The decision establishes that the procedural timeline is triggered by the filing of the suit, not the service of documents.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 129 ust. 4 p.o.ś.; The hearing date prescribed by law is preserved if a lawsuit is filed during its pendency, irrespective of when the defendant receives the summons.

Keywords

AI generated
Code of Civil Procedure hearing date preservation service of summons procedural timeline lawsuit filing civil litigation procedural deadline

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 129 ust. 4 p.o.ś.
Termin zawity przewidziany w art. 129 ust. 4 p.o.ś. zostaje zachowany, jeżeli w trakcie jego biegu osoba uprawniona wniesie pozew do sądu, bez względu na to, kiedy pozwanemu zostanie doręczony odpis pozwu.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Termin zawity przewidziany w art. 129 ust. 4 p.o.ś. zostaje zachowany, jeżeli w trakcie jego biegu osoba uprawniona wniesie pozew do sądu, bez względu na to, kiedy pozwanemu zostanie doręczony odpis pozwu.