Failure to accept insurance replacement car offer without valid reason excludes insurer's obligation to cover rental costs.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the claimant's request for reimbursement of vehicle rental expenses incurred after rejecting the insurance company's replacement car offer. The claimant failed to provide substantial reasons for declining the initial offer, which was deemed more expensive than the alternative. Consequently, the court ruled that the insurer was not obligated to cover the costs associated with the rental period following the unjustified rejection.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 10 ust. 1 Kodeks cywilny; Art. 10 ust. 2 Kodeks cywilny: Failure to accept the insurer's offer of a replacement vehicle without substantial justification excludes the insurer's obligation to cover the costs of renting a substitute vehicle.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Nie skorzystanie przez poszkodowanego, bez wskazania istotnych przyczyn z ofery najmu pojazdu zastępczego złożonej przez zakład ubezpieczeń sprawcy szkody, wyłącza obowiazek pokrycia przez ten zakład kosztów najmu zwiazanych z przyjęciem przez poszkodowanego oferty droższej