Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KIO 940/18 AI generated

Public procurement court dismisses one bid error claim but allows another, voiding the winner's selection.

Case Number KIO 940/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The National Reconsideration Chamber dismissed the appeal regarding SYSMEX Polska's bid due to the contracting authority's failure to formally respond to the bidder's objection. However, the court allowed the appeal concerning KAWA.SKA's bid, finding that the authority incorrectly applied the rejection clause and failed to verify specific technical requirements. Consequently, the court ordered the voiding of the winning bid decision and a new evaluation process for KAWA.SKA while rejecting SYSMEX's claim.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 89 ust. 1 pkt 2, 6 Pzp; Art. 192 ust. 1, 2, 3, 9, 10 Pzp: The court must distinguish between formal and substantive appeal decisions; if a substantive ruling is made, the entire decision must be a judgment, and appeals against non-responsive bids are dismissed without prejudice.

Keywords

AI generated
public procurement law bid evaluation errors contracting authority duties technical specifications compliance appeal procedure rules voiding winning bid procedural response requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 89 ust. 1 pkt 2 Pzp
art. 89 ust. 1 pkt 6 Pzp
art. 192 ust. 1 Pzp
art. 192 ust. 2 Pzp
art. 192 ust. 3 pkt 1 Pzp
art. 192 ust. 9 Pzp
art. 192 ust. 10 Pzp
§ 3 pkt 1 lit. a i pkt 2 lit. b § 5 ust. 4 rozporządzenia Prezesa Rady Ministrów z dnia 15 marca 2010 r.
art. 355 § 2 k.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Sąd Najwyższy, uchwala z 8 grudnia 2005 r. III CZP 109/05 (OSN 2006/11/182)
III CRN 77/93
I ACa 1018/05
III CZP 109/05
Failure to submit proof of service is a formal defect; costs rulings are decided by order, not judgment.
AI generated
XXIII Zs 100/25
Court dismissed public tender appeal regarding alleged low price and wage calculation errors.
XXIII Zs 20/23
Court dismisses appeal in public procurement case, upholding rejection of tender offer due to software licensing non-compliance.
XXIII Zs 138/21
Court dismissed appeal against public tender rejection due to unreliable low price explanation.
XXIII Zs 99/23
Appeal dismissed; costs awarded to State; late evidence rejected; consortium members not parties to appeal proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text