KIO 2717/17
AI generated
KIO allows appeal, voids contract award, and orders re-evaluation of bids due to low price and cost transparency issues.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the contracting authority's objection and upheld the bidders' appeal, voiding the award decision. The court found that the winning consortium's offer was rejected due to a significantly low price and a failure to provide detailed cost breakdowns for administrative costs and personnel. Consequently, the court ordered the authority to re-evaluate all bids and reject the late entrant's offer based on specific statutory grounds.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 89 ust. 1 pkt 2 i 4 oraz art. 90 ust. 3 Prawa zamówień publicznych; if a bid is significantly lower than others without justification or lacks cost transparency, it must be rejected, and the award voided.
Keywords
AI generated
public procurement law
significantly low price
cost transparency requirement
bid rejection grounds
voiding award decision
administrative costs limit
re-evaluation of offers
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 89 ust. 1 pkt 2 i 4 Prawa zamówień publicznych
art. 90 ust. 3 Prawa zamówień publicznych
art. 192 ust. 9 i 10 Prawa zamówień publicznych
§ 5 ust. 2 pkt 1 rozporządzenia Prezesa Rady Ministrów z dnia 15 marca 2010 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu pobierania wpisu od odwołania oraz rodzajów kosztów w postępowaniu odwoławczym i sposobu ich rozliczania
art. 152 K.p
Related Decisions
AI generatedXXIII Ga 1423/20
Court dismissed public procurement appeal, awarding costs to the losing party under specific procurement law provisions.
XXIII Zs 124/23
Court dismissed public procurement appeal, ruling that tenderers must follow instructions and cannot claim errors favor them.
XXIII Zs 178/24
Public procurement court dismissed appeal on low price suspicion, ruling evidence insufficient to overturn KIO decision.
XXIII Zs 97/24
Appeal dismissed; court rejected arguments based on prior case where plaintiff lost and was not a bidder.
XXIII Zs 76/24
Public procurement court invalidates tender selection due to legal error and orders procedural restart.