KIO 2077/17
AI generated
KIO dismissed contractor's appeal regarding public tender evaluation errors and awarded full costs to the appellant.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe National Reconsideration Chamber dismissed the contractor's appeal against the tender authority's decision to award a public catering service contract. The appellant argued that the authority failed to reject a competitor's offer and incorrectly evaluated distance points despite the competitor lacking a valid business license. The court found no evidence of procedural violations or incorrect assessment, ruling that the authority acted within its discretion.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 89 ust. 1 pkt 2 Pzp; Art. 91 ust. 1 Pzp: The National Reconsideration Chamber dismissed the appeal because the tender authority did not commit a procedural violation or incorrect assessment of the offer, and the appellant failed to prove the authority's decision was unlawful.
Keywords
AI generated
public procurement law
tender evaluation errors
business license requirement
distance point criteria
costs of appeal
procedural violation
contract award decision
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 198a and 198b of the Public Procurement Law of January 29, 2004
art. 192 ust. 9 and 10 of the Public Procurement Law of January 29, 2004
art. 98 § 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure
art. 186 ust. 6 of the Public Procurement Law of January 29, 2004
§ 5 ust. 3 pkt 1 and § 5 ust. 4 of the Regulation of the Prime Minister of March 15, 2010
art. 98 § 1 k.p.c
art. 99 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedpostanowienie SN z dnia 31 stycznia 1991 r. II CZ 255/90
wyrok Sądu Okręgowego w Gliwicach z 20 lipca 2016 r. sygn. akt X Ga 280/16
wyrok Sądu Okręgowego w Warszawie z 22 stycznia 2016 r. sygn. akt XXIII Ga 1992/15
postanowienie Sądu Okręgowego we Wrocławiu z dnia 3 października 2013 r. sygn. akt X Ga 286/13
wyrok Sądu Okręgowego w Warszawie z dnia 29 listopada 2016 r. sygn. akt XXIII Ga 880/16
wyrok Sądu Okręgowego we Wrocławiu z 17 listopada 2016 r. sygn. akt X Ga 653/16
III CZP 109/05
Failure to submit proof of service is a formal defect; costs rulings are decided by order, not judgment.
X Ga 280/16
XXIII Ga 1992/15
Court dismissed appeal on public procurement costs, ruling partial allowance warrants split cost allocation per law.
X Ga 286/13