Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II K 468/18 AI generated

Court sentenced accomplice to four months prison for burglary, citing prior recidivism and poor criminal prognosis.

Case Number II K 468/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court found A. P. and M. D. guilty of burglary and sentenced them to fines and imprisonment respectively. M. D. was convicted for a planned theft involving forced entry into an industrial hall, resulting in approximately 700 zł in losses. The judge imposed a four-month prison term on M. D. due to his history of similar offenses and a negative criminal prognosis indicating a need for immediate punitive action.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 279 § 1 k.k. w zw. z art. 283 k.k.; Art. 37a k.k.; Art. 46 § 1 k.k.; Art. 63 § 1 k.k.; Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 17 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych; The court may impose immediate imprisonment without suspension for repeat offenders when prior probation failed and the criminal prognosis indicates a high risk of reoffending.

Keywords

AI generated
burglary with forced entry immediate imprisonment sentence criminal prognosis assessment complicity in theft prior conviction recidivism damage compensation obligation court costs exemption

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 279 § 1 k.k. w zw. z art. 283 k.k.
Art. 37a k.k.
Art. 46 § 1 k.k.
Art. 44 § 2 k.k.
Art. 63 § 1 k.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 17 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text