Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I C 251/13 AI generated

Civil court dismissed claim for damages against former lawyer for negligence and statute of limitations.

Case Number I C 251/13
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for 1.2 million zloty against his former lawyer, who had been appointed as a mandatory legal representative. The plaintiff argued that the lawyer's negligence caused financial loss and moral damage, but the court found no causal link between the lawyer's actions and the alleged harm. Furthermore, the court ruled that the claim was time-barred because more than three years had passed since the plaintiff learned of the final judgment in the underlying case.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 471 k.c.; Art. 415 k.c.; Art. 6 k.c.; Art. 442(1) par. 1 k.c.: A claim for damages against a mandatory legal representative for procedural negligence is dismissed if the plaintiff fails to prove causation and the claim is time-barred under the three-year limitation period.

Keywords

AI generated
mandatory legal representative procedural negligence statute of limitations causation requirement civil damages claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 471 k.c.
Art. 415 k.c.
Art. 6 k.c.
Art. 442(1) par. 1 k.c.
Art. 113 §1 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 102 k.p.c.
art. 415 k.c
art. 5 k.c
art. 451 k.c
art. 49 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
II CSK 210/12
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text