III K 548/17
AI generated
Court convicted defendant of theft for accepting stolen dental equipment without verifying its legal origin.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of theft for accepting dental equipment from a seller who admitted the goods were likely stolen. The defendant failed to exercise due diligence by requesting documentation proving the equipment's legal origin, despite obvious red flags like non-standard packaging. Consequently, the court imposed a fine of 200 daily rates and ordered the defendant to pay court costs to the state.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 292 § 1 k.k.; Art. 286 § 1 k.k.: Accepting stolen property without verifying its legal origin constitutes theft when the recipient should have suspected the illegal nature of the goods.
Keywords
AI generated
theft by acceptance
duty of care
stolen equipment
criminal liability
due diligence standard
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 292 § 1 k.k.
Art. 33 § 1 and 3 kk
Art. 53 § 1 k.k.
Art. 115 § 2 k.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 292 § 1 k.k
art. 627 k.p.k
art. 291 k.k
art. 286 § 1 k.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedII K 868/13
Court convicts defendant of theft and confiscates illicit gains, applying in dubio pro reo principle due to evidentiary gaps.
II Ka 399/14
Court partially allowed prosecutor's appeal to correct asset forfeiture amount to 794 PLN based on sale proceeds.
III KK 298/25
Supreme Court quashes theft conviction due to procedural errors in damage assessment and subjective intent evaluation.
II K 43/26
Court acquits defendant of theft of stolen goods due to lack of evidence proving illegal acquisition.