Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III AUa 1163/16 AI generated

Social security court dismisses pension appeal due to lack of continuous contribution periods before disability onset.

Case Number III AUa 1163/16
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the appellant's appeal against a social security office's refusal to grant a disability pension. The appellant argued for a continuous contribution period, but the court clarified that the law requires uninterrupted coverage immediately preceding the disability onset, excluding minor breaks. Consequently, the court ruled that the appellant failed to meet the statutory prerequisites for the pension benefit.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych, art. 58 ust. 3; The law requires uninterrupted social insurance coverage immediately preceding the onset of disability, excluding minor breaks, rather than a single continuous period within the entire insurance history.

Keywords

AI generated
social security pension disability benefit continuous contribution period uninterrupted insurance coverage social insurance law pension eligibility contribution history

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 58 ust. 3 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych
art. 385 k.p.c.
art. 108 § 1 zdanie 1 k.p.c.
§ 12 ust. 1 pkt 2 w zw. z § 11 ust. 1 pkt 2 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 28 września 2002 r.
art. 350 § 1 k.p.c
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 385 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text