II K 1265/17
AI generated
Court convicted defendant of assault causing minor injury and sentenced him to community service and compensation.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of intentional injury under Article 157 of the Criminal Code and sentenced him to five months of community service. The defendant admitted guilt during investigation but denied it at trial, arguing the victim's injuries were exaggerated. The court found the evidence sufficient to establish a broken nose and awarded 3,000 zloty in compensation, deeming the requested 8,000 zloty excessive.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 157 § 2 k.k.; Art. 445 § 1 k.c.: The court may convict for intentional injury causing temporary impairment and award civil compensation for non-material damage based on the severity of physical and psychological suffering, without being bound by fixed amounts.
Keywords
AI generated
intentional injury
minor bodily harm
civil compensation
community service
criminal liability
non-material damage
court discretion
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 157 § 2 k.k.
Art. 445 § 1 k.c.
Art. 46 § 1 k.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 157 § 2 k.k
art. 156 § 1 k.k
art. 157 § 1 k.k
art. 53 k.k
art. 445 k.c
art. 445 § 1 k.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIV CSK 99/05
Supreme Court increases compensation for chronic liver disease victim due to insufficient individualized assessment of damages under Civil Code.
I ACa 1983/04
IV CK 384/05
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on damages for personal injury, ruling no clear error in compensation assessment. The court upholds the appellate court's decision to award damages based on specific criteria. The court emphasizes that compensation must reflect the average standard of living while remaining reasonable. The decision clarifies that comparing damages across different cases is not a valid method for review. The court finds the awarded amount appropriate given the victim's severe injuries and age. The ruling reinforces the compensatory nature of damages within legal limits. The court rejects the appellant's argument regarding arbitrary assessment of personal injury. The judgment stands based on the absence of obvious violation of legal standards. The court maintains that no single sum can fully restore health or normal life. The decision ensures fairness by balancing compensation with societal economic conditions.
Related Decisions
AI generatedVIII Ka 562/12
w dniu 20 października 2011 r.
IX Ka 1125/15
Prokuratura Rejonowa w Starachowicach oskarżyła M.
VIII Ka 791/14
W. został oskarżony o to, że: w dniu 12 października 2013r. w S. na ul. (...), dokonał uszkodzenia ciała T. K. (1) w ten sposób, że kopał pokrzywdzonego w twarz i głowę, w wyniku czego doznał on stłuczenia głębokiego tkanek miękkich, powłok zewnętrznych twarzy i głowy, złamania dolnej ściany oczodołu lewego przechodzące na kość sitowa, wieloodłamowego złamania kości nosa z przegrodą i przemieszczenia odłamków kostnych, co spowodowało naruszenie narządu czynności ciała na czas przekraczający 7 dni,
IV Ka 486/14
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for threats after finding witness testimony credible despite inconsistencies.